|
Sunday, November 08, 2009 - 4:44 PM
Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire While the
crimes of Jack the Ripper may never be solved, it's also clear that
people will continue to try to do so, some with new ideas about former
suspects and some with new suspects.  Jack the Rippers Black Magic Rituals by Ivor Edwards Ivor Edwards's 2003 book, Jack the Ripper's Black Magic Rituals,
makes a contribution in the latter genre, and his ideas certainly make
us rethink the crimes. One might believe that with the vast popularity
of Dan Brown's The DaVinci Code, a book like this that relies
on codes, ciphers, and sacred geometry would be like a nightlight to
moths, but the Introduction by occult scholar Charles Henry makes it
seem rather daunting. It's much clearer when Edwards later lays it out,
but this is no fast-paced, factoid-laden riddle. Instead, reading this
theory requires sustained concentration to follow the logic from one
crime to another, and it's reminiscent of the way die-hard fans of the
Zodiac killer have created intricate games out of his alleged
convoluted formulas.
In short, Jack the Ripper now
comes across as an intelligent magician with a clear sense of purpose,
an understanding of geographical geometry, and the graceful movements
of a cat. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
Edwards begins by claiming that in the
entire history of the investigation of the Whitechapel crimes, both
then and now, no one before him had ever thought to measure the actual
distance from one crime scene to another. He does so and his results
are startling. The distances are strikingly consistent, as if these
could not possibly have been random murders but were planned for those
locations—including the room where Mary Kelly died. Like a spider
waiting for passing flies, the violence was situation specific. And it
had a sinister program. After detailing each murder
within this new framework, Edwards claims that most of the theories
about the Ripper's motives and behavior are erroneous. He was not a
sexual killer, his behavior was not escalating, and he did not end the
spree for any reason other than that he was finished with what he had
set out to do. He had set the number at five and he had accomplished
that. In fact, this suspect was twice questioned by
the police, and many people who knew him believed he was Jack the
Ripper, including his lover. Edwards makes a case
that Jack the Ripper was a man named Dr. Robert D'Onston Stephenson, a
former military surgeon who had studied the Black Arts in Africa and
had published an article about it. He eluded the law in London so
easily, in part because his movements were inherently quiet, and in
part because he was a self-committed patient at a hospital in
Whitechapel, with easy access for getting out and in again. It was
close to the crime scenes. Prior to killing anyone,
he had walked the Whitechapel streets to learn how they lay, mapping
locations according to the shape of a sacred symbol known as the Vesica Piscis,
a design that had purportedly been used for the Great Pyramid,
Stonehenge, and the Jerusalem Temple, among others. He'd apparently
told others that the murders had been by design at that, with five,
they were finished. Stephenson, known to his
associates as D'Onston, had met Madame Blavatsky, co-founder of the
Theosophical Society, and was apparently easily swayed by the idea that
there are hidden laws of nature which magicians and occultists can
manipulate for greater power. He liked people to know that he was such
a person. In fact, he claimed to have murdered a female witch doctor
and may have murdered his own wife just a year before the Whitechapel
killings began. She disappeared in 1887and no one knows what happened
to her. While this is not the first time that
D'Onston has been proposed as a candidate for Red Jack, it may be the
first time someone has made a point of tracing out the murders in a
manner the supports the idea of occultic sacrifices instead of serial
sexual murders. Edwards provides maps and photographs to show how the
murders actually lay out according to a complex symbolic design. He
also provides a detailed account of D'Onston's whereabouts (he was
indeed a resident of the hospital throughout the period), and uses the
man's ideas from his later publications to explain why he did what he
did with each victim. Essentially, female organs
were considered a source of power in an inherently progenerative
universe (both the symbol and the real thing), so D'Onston had sliced
these organs from two victims and taken samples for his own dark
purposes—possibly for making ceremonial candles. He was not attempting
to relive the crimes in some sick fantasy, as some have said, but
allegedly to offer the universe a way to channel its power through him. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
Why
select Whitechapel, one might yet ask? Apparently D'Onston had
contracted VD from a prostitute. Whether this prostitute-thick area was
coincidentally part of his plan or he chose it from some need for
revenge is anyone's guess. Certainly, the after-dark times he chose for
his attacks made it more likely that his victims would be from this
class of women. Ironically, five years after the
murders, D'Onston converted to Christianity, and the person who was
instrumental in that process had once been a prostitute. While
Edwards takes pot shots at other theories and Ripperologists, no doubt
his idea will get its share of pokes and jabs. Nevertheless, given the
measurements he makes (if they are indeed accurate) and the known facts
about his suspect, at the very least it's a theory to be given due
consideration.
|